Solow's Harrod

Author(s)
Verena Halsmayer
Abstract

Abstract: Modern growth theory derives mostly from Solow's “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth” (1956). Solow's own interpretation locates its origins in his view that Harrod's growth model implied a tendency toward progressive collapse of the economy. He formulates his view in terms of Harrod's invoking a fixed-coefficients production function. We challenge Solow's reading of Harrod's “Essay in Dynamic Theory,” arguing that Harrod's object in providing a “dynamic” theory had little to do with the problem of long-run growth as Solow understood it, but instead addressed medium-run fluctuations, the “inherent instability” of economies. Solow's interpretation of Harrod was grounded in a particular culture of understanding embedded in the practice of formal modelling that emerged in economics in the post-Second World War period. Solow's interpretation, which ultimately dominated the profession's view of Harrod, is a case study in the difficulties in communicating across distinct interpretive communities and of the potential for losing content and insights in the process. Harrod's objects – particularly, of trying to account for a tendency of the economy toward chronic recessions – were lost to the mainstream literature.

Organisation(s)
Department of History
External organisation(s)
Duke University
Journal
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Volume
23
Pages
561-596
No. of pages
36
ISSN
0967-2567
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2014.1001763
Publication date
07-2016
Peer reviewed
Yes
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
502047 Economic theory, 601022 Contemporary history
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
General Arts and Humanities, Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), History and Philosophy of Science
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
Portal url
https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/f37dae76-9203-44c8-a3da-8372c86c8775